Resource

Seljuk Empire History Timeline: Dandanqan, Baghdad, Manzikert and Rum

A source-aware Seljuk history timeline from Oghuz frontier origins and the 1040 Battle of Dandanqan through Baghdad, Manzikert, Persianate institutions, political fragmentation and the Sultanate of Rum.

Data updated July 12, 2026 at 04:38 AMSeljuk timeline1040-1194Battle of ManzikertSultanate of RumPersianate institutionssource-aware historymedieval Islamic history
Seljuk Empire History Timeline: Dandanqan, Baghdad, Manzikert and Rum

Core coverage

Late 10th century-c. 1308; Great Seljuks and Rum separated

Timeline entries

32 source-labeled turning points

Editorial method

Separates dynasty, empire, regional branches, migration, institutions and later cultural afterlives

Last reviewed

12 July 2026

The name Seljuk does not describe one unchanging centralized empire. It can refer to a ruling family of Oghuz Turkic origin, the Great Seljuk sultanate that dominated much of Iran and Iraq, regional branches in Syria and Kirman, and the Sultanate of Rum in Anatolia. The Battle of Dandanqan in 1040 established Seljuk power in Khurasan, while Tughril's entry into Baghdad in 1055 changed the relationship between military sultans and the Abbasid caliph. Neither date by itself created every later Seljuk state.

Alp Arslan's victory over Emperor Romanos IV at Manzikert on 26 August 1071 was a major turning point, but the battle did not instantly transfer all Anatolia or replace its population. Byzantine civil wars, Turkmen mobility, local alliances, repeated campaigns and the emergence of several principalities shaped the following decade. Under Malik Shah and the vizier Nizam al-Mulk, court power, Persian administration, roads, taxation, patronage and madrasas connected a wide but negotiated political order. Succession struggles after both men died in 1092 then exposed how much power depended on households, commanders and regional rulers.

The death of Sultan Sanjar in 1157 ended effective Great Seljuk supremacy in the east, while Tughril III's defeat in 1194 ended the western Iranian line. Seljuk political and cultural histories nevertheless continued through successor states, especially Rum. Its rulers developed Konya and trade routes, sponsored caravanserais and madrasas, and negotiated with Byzantines, Crusaders, Armenians, Georgians, Muslim neighbors and merchants. The Mongol victory at Kose Dag in 1243 made Rum subordinate; the conventional end around 1307 or 1308 describes a dynastic endpoint, not the disappearance of Seljuk architecture, Persianate culture or Anatolian Muslim institutions.

How to use this timeline

Use the four eras to keep political names and geographic scope from collapsing into one empire-shaped block.

  • Late 10th century-1055 follows uncertain family origins, migration into Khurasan, Dandanqan and entry into Baghdad.
  • 1055-1092 covers caliphal-sultanic relations, Alp Arslan, Manzikert, Malik Shah, administration and the first Rum polity.
  • 1092-1157 traces succession conflict, Crusader-era fragmentation, Sanjar, Qatwan and the Oghuz revolt.
  • 1157-c. 1308 separates the Iranian dynastic endpoint from the commercial and architectural history of Seljuk Rum.

Evidence rules

Chronicles, coins, inscriptions, buildings, waqf records, objects and later dynastic histories preserve different kinds of evidence.

  • Treat the conversion and early genealogy of the Seljuk family as reconstructed history, not a perfectly dated origin story.
  • Do not use a map at Malik Shah's death as proof of identical control in every city, pasture, frontier or household.
  • Do not make Manzikert the instant conquest, conversion or demographic replacement of all Anatolia.
  • Distinguish the Great Seljuks' political end from the Seljuk branches and from institutions that survived dynastic rule.

What this hub connects

Existing guides help readers move from the dynasty-wide chronology into education, Baghdad and the later Mongol conquest.

  • The Nizamiyya guide separates its 1065 foundation, 1067 opening, waqf structure and al-Ghazali's later appointment.
  • The House of Wisdom guide prevents the Seljuk and Mongol periods from being folded into one library-destruction myth.
  • The 1258 Baghdad guide follows the Abbasid capital after Seljuk political supremacy had already fragmented.

Origins and state formation, late 10th century-1055

Reconstructed family origins, Khurasan, Dandanqan and Baghdad show how mobile leadership acquired cities, revenue and dynastic authority.

DateEventWhy it mattersEvidence label
Late 10th centurySeljuk family enters the Muslim frontier worldLater accounts connect the family to Oghuz steppe politics, migration near Jand and conversion to Islam; exact chronology remains reconstructed.Later genealogies, regional chronicles and modern reconstruction
c. 1020sTughril and Chaghri lead mobile Oghuz followersThe brothers operate among changing alliances and military-client relationships before controlling a durable territorial state.Ghaznavid, regional and later Seljuk narrative traditions
1035Seljuk leaders enter KhurasanTughril, Chaghri and their followers seek pasture, recognition and revenue inside a Ghaznavid political landscape.Ghaznavid chronicles and Seljuk origin narratives
1037-1038Merv, Herat and Nishapur change handsControl of major Khurasani cities turns a mobile confederation into a claimant to urban taxation, administration and sovereignty.Regional chronologies and urban records
23 May 1040Battle of DandanqanSeljuk forces defeat Sultan Masud's Ghaznavid army near Merv, establishing the conventional political beginning of the Great Seljuks.Ghaznavid-Seljuk chronicles and modern military study
1040sFamily members divide commands and regionsTughril, Chaghri and other commanders expand through negotiated family and military authority rather than a uniform modern bureaucracy.Investiture, coin and chronicle evidence
1048Battle near Kapetron or PasinlerA major Byzantine-Seljuk frontier clash predates Manzikert and shows that Turkic movement into eastern Anatolia was already underway.Byzantine, Armenian and Islamic narrative sources
18 Dec 1055Tughril enters BaghdadBuyid control ends and the Seljuk ruler becomes the dominant military power around the Abbasid caliph without becoming caliph himself.Baghdad chronicles and later Seljuk history

Great sultanate and Manzikert, 1055-1092

Caliphal relations, Alp Arslan, Manzikert, Malik Shah, Nizam al-Mulk and early Rum combine expansion with negotiated institutions.

DateEventWhy it mattersEvidence label
1058-1059Baghdad crisis tests sultan and caliphRebellion, rival claims and ceremonial recognition show that Seljuk-Abbasid authority was negotiated and sometimes coercive.Arabic and Persian chronicles, titulature and coins
1063Alp Arslan succeeds TughrilAfter a contested succession, Alp Arslan and vizier Nizam al-Mulk consolidate a new court and campaign network.Court chronicles and administrative biographies
1064Seljuk forces capture AniThe conquest of the former Armenian royal city becomes a major frontier event with military, urban and community consequences.Armenian, Byzantine and Islamic accounts; material evidence
1065 and 1067Baghdad Nizamiyya is founded and openedThe two dates mark foundation and inauguration of a prestigious waqf-supported college associated with Nizam al-Mulk.Institutional chronicles, biographies and waqf scholarship
26 Aug 1071Battle of ManzikertAlp Arslan defeats and captures Romanos IV; the battle matters greatly, but civil war and migration shape the later loss of Byzantine control.Contemporary Byzantine and later Muslim narratives
1072Malik Shah becomes sultanHis reign with Nizam al-Mulk is associated with wide political reach, Isfahan, fiscal administration, roads and court patronage.Persian and Arabic chronicles, architecture, coins and objects
c. 1077-1081A Seljuk polity of Rum emerges in AnatoliaSuleiman ibn Qutalmish builds power around Nicaea amid Byzantine civil conflict; the early chronology and relationship to the Great Seljuks are not simple.Byzantine, Syriac and Islamic chronicles; later reconstruction
1089Malik Shah campaigns into TransoxianaThe campaign illustrates the empire's broad reach while dependence on local rulers and family arrangements limits any picture of uniform control.Regional chronicles and dynastic history

Succession conflict and Sanjar, 1092-1157

Succession wars, Crusader-era regional powers, Qatwan and the Oghuz revolt expose the limits of one empire-wide narrative.

DateEventWhy it mattersEvidence label
Oct-Nov 1092Nizam al-Mulk and Malik Shah dieThe deaths remove two central figures within weeks and trigger contests among heirs, court households, commanders and regional branches.Court chronicles and competing accounts of succession
1092-1105Succession wars fragment Great Seljuk authorityBarkiyaruq, Muhammad Tapar, Tutush and other claimants fight across Iran, Iraq and Syria, making regional power more visible.Arabic and Persian chronicles, coins and local dynastic records
1097First Crusade takes Nicaea from Seljuk RumRum loses its first major capital and shifts its center toward Konya, showing that Seljuk expansion was reversible and regionally uneven.Latin, Byzantine, Armenian and Islamic narratives
1118Sanjar becomes the senior Great Seljuk rulerSanjar's eastern court in Khurasan carries Great Seljuk prestige while western sultans, atabegs and caliphs exercise distinct power.Persian chronicles, coins and court literature
1121Seljuk-led forces lose at DidgoriThe Georgian victory restricts Muslim political power in the Caucasus and demonstrates the limits of loosely coordinated regional forces.Georgian, Armenian and Islamic narratives
9 Sep 1141Sanjar is defeated at QatwanThe Qara Khitai victory weakens Seljuk authority in Transoxiana and damages the fiscal and political balance of the eastern sultanate.Persian, Arabic and Central Asian chronicles
1153Oghuz revolt captures SanjarRebel Oghuz groups defeat and detain the sultan, while Khurasani cities and rural communities experience severe disruption.Persian chronicles and regional urban histories
1157Sanjar diesHis death is the clearest endpoint for effective Great Seljuk supremacy in the east, but it does not end every Seljuk dynasty.Dynastic chronology and later regional histories

Regional endpoints and Seljuk Rum, 1157-c. 1308

The Iranian lines and the Sultanate of Rum followed different chronologies, while trade, architecture and institutions outlived dynastic rule.

DateEventWhy it mattersEvidence label
1176Seljuk Rum wins at MyriokephalonKilij Arslan II defeats Manuel I Komnenos during a Byzantine campaign, reinforcing Rum's place in central Anatolia without ending Byzantine power.Byzantine and regional narratives
1194Tughril III is defeated and killedThe Khwarazm Shah defeats the last Seljuk sultan of western Iran, giving 1194 a different dynastic meaning from Sanjar's 1157 death.Persian dynastic chronicles and chronology
1204Latin conquest reshapes the Anatolian balanceThe fragmentation of Byzantine authority after the Fourth Crusade creates opportunities and rivals for Rum, Nicaea and Trebizond.Byzantine, Latin and Seljuk-era regional histories
1207Rum captures AntalyaMediterranean access supports diplomacy, customs revenue and long-distance trade rather than an inland-only picture of the sultanate.Chronicles, inscriptions and commercial history
1214Rum captures SinopBlack Sea access strengthens transit routes linking Anatolia with Crimea, Iran and Mediterranean commerce.Chronicles, inscriptions, coins and trade records
1220-1237Reign of Ala al-Din Kayqubad IRum reaches a political and commercial high point associated with Konya, Alanya, fortifications, caravanserais and court patronage.Buildings, inscriptions, coins, chronicles and objects
26 Jun 1243Mongols defeat Rum at Kose DagThe defeat makes the sultanate subordinate to Mongol power and later the Ilkhanate while Seljuk rulers continue with reduced authority.Armenian, Persian and Seljuk-era chronicles
c. 1307-1308Conventional end of the Seljuk line of RumDynastic rule ends amid Ilkhanid supremacy and Anatolian beyliks, but Seljuk buildings, trade routes and Persianate institutions remain influential.Dynastic chronology, coins, inscriptions and later histories

FAQ

When did the Seljuk Empire begin?

1040 is the most useful conventional start for the Great Seljuk sultanate because Tughril and Chaghri defeated the Ghaznavids at Dandanqan and secured Khurasan. The family and its followers had an earlier, less securely dated history.

Why was Baghdad in 1055 important?

Tughril entered Baghdad and ended Buyid control over the Abbasid capital. Seljuk sultans exercised military and political power while the Abbasid caliph retained religious, legal and dynastic authority; the relationship was cooperative and contested rather than a simple transfer of the caliphate.

Did Manzikert instantly give Anatolia to the Seljuks?

No. The battle defeated and captured Romanos IV, but Byzantine officials and communities remained across Anatolia. Civil war, mobile Turkmen groups, local alliances and later campaigns made the 1070s more decisive than one afternoon alone.

Were the Great Seljuks and the Sultanate of Rum the same state?

They belonged to related Seljuk dynastic histories, but Rum developed as an Anatolian branch with its own rulers, capitals, wars and institutions. It survived the Great Seljuk lines in Iran and Iraq by more than a century.

Did the Great Seljuk Empire end in 1157 or 1194?

1157 marks Sultan Sanjar's death and the end of effective Great Seljuk supremacy in the east. In western Iran, a Seljuk line continued until Tughril III was defeated and killed in 1194. The dates answer different regional and dynastic questions.

What happened to the Sultanate of Rum after 1243?

The Mongol victory at Kose Dag made Rum subordinate to Mongol and later Ilkhanid power. Seljuk sultans continued with reduced authority amid factional rule until the dynasty's conventional endpoint around 1307 or 1308.

Related reading

Sources

Languages